Dear all
Has anybody had the scenario recently where police say that client eligible for a caution if admissions made, but the only truthful admission client capable of making is “I don’t remember what happened because
I was so drunk but I accept that the police’s witnesses’ recollection is better than mine therefore I accept that it happened as they say it happened”? If so, did client advance that in the interview and what did the police do?
Edward Jones
| Partner
| For Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors |
|
|
Tel: |
020 7874 8369 |
|
|
Fax: |
020 7874 8306 |
|||
Email: |
ejones@hja.net |
|||
CJSM: |
edward.jones@hja.cjsm.net |
|||
Web: |
|
___________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
Hodge Jones & Allen Solicitors |
180 North Gower Street, London NW1 2NB |
DX 2101 Euston |
Tel + 44 (0) 20 7874 8300 | Fax +44 (0) 20 7388 2106 |
/
|
|