Dear all , was it ever clearer that cuts to scope and fees were cynical political choices .
Even now we are invited by LAA guidance to pass on duty slots if we dont want to do them .No one should .Face to face is unsafe for everyone so the best we can do is telephone advice unless another remote working solution can be devised .

My hope is that we emerge from this united and with the collective will to force changes to scope and fees .

Good luck and love to you all .Greg P 



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: Rhean Bailey <rb@goldmanbaileysolicitors.co.uk>
Date: 25/03/2020 13:11 (GMT+00:00)
To: Greg Foxsmith <gregfoxsmith@msn.com>, Bruce Reid <brucerzzz@googlemail.com>
Cc: Kate Goold <K.Goold@bindmans.com>, David Holmes <David@daltonholmesgray.co.uk>, Sebah Naz Baig <naz@snbaig.com>, members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: RE: Court duty solicitor attendance

Hi Greg, Bruce, all


I have withdrawn GB from all in person court attendances, after spending Friday as duty at Highbury, and seeing there were zero measures in place to protect court users and pathetically limited measures in place for court staff.

 

Videolink/telephone for urgent hearings needs to be implemented immediately.

 

If we keep turning up ‘as normal’, the CJS will just continue to operate this unsafe environment - probably until a court user actually drops dead. And I’m not willing to participate in that. As Bruce says, this isn’t just an individual choice for individuals to take on their own health, it has massive implications for everyone we come into contact with – our clients included, obviously - and ultimately on the real frontline workers in the NHS.

 

Take care

 

Rhean

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> On Behalf Of Greg Foxsmith
Sent: 25 March 2020 12:44
To: Bruce Reid <brucerzzz@googlemail.com>
Cc: Kate Goold <K.Goold@bindmans.com>; David Holmes <David@daltonholmesgray.co.uk>; Sebah Naz Baig <naz@snbaig.com>; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: Re: Court duty solicitor attendance

 

PSP are leading, the question is whether others will follow. 

Would it help if other firms were explicit in what action they are taking (if any) to protect their staff from dangerous and un-necessary court attendances? 

 

Greg

 

Greg Foxsmith, 

07980 846330



On 25 Mar 2020, at 12:28, Bruce Reid (via members list) <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> wrote:



Dear David and others,

 

Can we just forget about official guidance for once? Where has it got the Nation so far, in this mess eh? Greg's approach below is the right one. Hard to doubt his firm's commitment to representing Defendants. We should not enter an unsafe system of work, risk ourselves being infected and spread any infection further at a time when the NHS staff are on their knees. I would hate my obituary to be "He was Duty at Croydon, caught COV 19 from a shoplifter on a warrant and sadly succumbed....'

 

The HMCTS and LAA have never given a flying %%%% about the health and safety of us or any of the staff in the cells or the prisoners. The sanitiser debacle is but an example of this. Most if not all courts are insanitary at the best of times. Now they are dangerous. Where is the contract cleaner with disinfectant constantly doing the rounds of the door handles and communal surfaces? Could have been arranged with one email. 'Never mind, we will have an emergency meeting next week and put it on the agenda.'

 

They can cure half the problem by saying that no prisoners will be accepted at court. They will all be on virtual. Less movement, less contact, less risk for the Defendant. This doesn't need legislation. A duty goes into an isolated, deep cleaned room with a live links and works from there, then leaves not having been in court, the cells or any appreciable time in the public area. With a bit of bodging and Skype/zoom this could be done even more remotely in a week or so.

 

The emollient guff published by Mr Mcallister yesterday makes no mention of this. I would expect no less. They have had weeks to come up with something. Don't these people have any sense of forward planning?

 

This is distinguished management. 

 

They short change us as a matter of policy and then coerce us with phoney references to upholding professional standards. We should stop here.

 

Bruce Reid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 11:00, Kate Goold <K.Goold@bindmans.com> wrote:

Here is the clearest guidance so far from the Chief Magistrate- but relating to extradition only:

Dear DELF members,

You may have already received this via HMCTS notifications, but I have been asked by the Administrative Court Office to circulate the arrangements for applications for immediate/urgent consideration - please see the email below. Aside from urgent applications for immediate consideration which are to be sent to the newly created inbox, any other queries which relate to extradition or crime should be sent to:
Administrativecourtoffice.crimex@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk.

The Chief Magistrate has confirmed this morning that:

  • Telephone hearings in Court 3 are proceeding successfully.
  • Two duty solicitors were in court yesterday and very many thanks are due to them. There was one new case yesterday and there appears to be one new one today. She suspects that situation will continue.
  • Generally, all full hearings in the next 20 days will be adjourned on application, then listed for a no parties to attend in person but appear by telephone, email or by any other means.
  • The extradition judges are sitting three courts a day in WMC with court 3 being the only extradition court.

In other news:

  • M&S are offering free flowers to any shoppers if any of you are attending in person to WMC.

May I suggest that members, if not already doing so, track the Coronavirus Bill to follow the amendments to Section 206 of the Extradition Act 2003, as it appears that Live Link arrangements will be extended to extradition hearings and will include an interests of justice test for decisions in this regard, which may come into effect at any time if the Bill is passed.

Kind regards,
Hannah Hinton
DELF Court Liaison Officer

 

On Behalf Of Administrative Court Office, General Office
Sent: 24 March 2020 17:51
Subject: Administrative Court - Applications for Immediate/Urgent Consideration (“Immediates”) * OFFICIAL *
Importance: High

 

Dear All

 

Administrative Court - Applications for Immediate/Urgent Consideration (“Immediates”)

                                                                                                                                                                                

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and further to the most recent Government advice regarding social distancing, from Wednesday 25 March 2020 until further notice the Administrative Court Office will no longer accept applications for immediate or urgent consideration over the counter or by post/DX.

 

“Immediates” applications – i.e. situations where it is contended that irreversible action will take place if the Court does not act to prevent it, or where an expedited judicial review is required, will now only be accepted electronically, as follows: 

  1. Applications must be filed by email to administrativecourtoffice.immediates@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk . This inbox will be monitored Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Outside of these hours the existing out of hours procedure will apply.
  2. If you are a legal representative you must include a PBA number in your covering email if you have one, or alternatively an undertaking to send a cheque for the fee by post within 7 days
  3. If you are not legally represented, you must record in writing in your covering email that you agree to pay the court fee, or to file the relevant fee remission documentation with the Fees Office by post within 7 days. Any court order made as a result of your application will include a direction to this effect.  
  4. Your application must be accompanied by an electronic bundle containing only those documents which it will be necessary for the court to read for the purposes of determining the application.
  5. In all cases where the application is filed by a legal representative the electronic bundle:
    1. must be a single PDF not exceeding 20mb in size;
    2. must be numbered in ascending order regardless of whether multiple documents have been combined together (the original page numbers of the document will be ignored and just the bundle page number will be referred to)
    3. Index pages and authorities must be numbered as part of the single PDF document (they are not to be skipped; they are part of the single PDF and must be numbered).
    4. The default display view size of all pages must always be 100%.
    5. Texts on all pages must be selectable to facilitate comments and highlights to be imposed on the texts
    6. The bookmarks must be labelled indicating what document they are referring to (it is best to have the same name or title as the actual document) and also display the relevant page numbers.
    7. The resolution on the electronic bundle must be reduced to about 200 to 300 dpi to prevent delays whilst scrolling from one page to another.
    8. The index page must be hyperlinked to the pages or documents it refers to.

            

Any application filed by a legal representative that does not comply with the above rules on electronic bundles may not be considered by a judge. If the application is filed by a litigant in person the electronic bundle must if at all possible, comply with the above rules. If it is not possible for a litigant in person to comply with the rules on electronic bundles, the application must include a brief explanation of the reasons for this

 

  1. If you are not legally represented and you do not have access to email, you should contact the Administrative Court Office by telephone on 020 7947 6158 (only to be used in an emergency) so that details of your application may be taken by telephone and alternative arrangements made if permitted by the Senior Legal Managers / Judge on duty.  

 

Any other urgent queries should be sent by email to administrativecourtoffice.generaloffice@hmcts.x.gsi.gov.uk as high priority and with ‘URGENT’ in the subject line. Any such emails will be dealt with as soon as possible.  

 

 

Thank you for your patience at this time.

 

 

 

Kate Goold | Partner | Bindmans LLP

Crime, Extradition, Fraud and Regulatory

T: +44(0)20 7833 4433 | D: +44 20 7833 7820 | F: +44(0)20 7014 2076

236 Gray’s Inn Road | London | WC1X 8HB | DX 37904 King’s Cross 

 

Engage with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Insight

 

  

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

This email is from Bindmans LLP. Bindmans LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under number OC335189. Its registered office is as set out above. Its VAT number is GB 234 2718 76. Bindmans LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A copy of the SRA's rules can be found at www.sra.org.uk/code-of-conduct.

A list of partners is available on request. The term ‘partner’ refers to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant who is a lawyer with equivalent standing and qualifications. Our services are provided by solicitors of England and Wales. This email is intended to be read only by the addressee. Its contents are confidential and may also be the subject of legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and it has therefore reached you by mistake, please notify this firm immediately at the address given below. You are hereby placed on notice that any copying, publication or any other form of dissemination of this email or its contents is prohibited. Communications including e-mails may be monitored in the interests of maintaining professional standards.

If you have received this email in error or have any questions please contact: postmaster@bindmans.com

 

 


This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.
For more information please visit
http://www.mimecast.com


From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> On Behalf Of Sebah Naz Baig
Sent: 25 March 2020 10:32
To: David Holmes <
David@daltonholmesgray.co.uk>; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: Re: Court duty solicitor attendance

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Bindmans LLP.

Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

I am based in the West Midlands and we received an update from the Birmingham Law Society yesterday which may provide some guidance for colleagues in London:

 

  • Today, all Magistrates’ Courts across our region have closed (Coventry, Walsall, Dudley, Wolverhampton and Birmingham) for all hearings except remand hearings and prisoner production for custody time limit and/or bail application hearings.

 

  • The CPS have asked the Police to de-warn all witnesses for trials this week.

 

  • The Courts are in the process of adjourning all first hearings from the week commencing 23 March 2020 to the week commencing 4 May 2020, and from the week commencing 30 March 2020 to the week commencing 11 May 2020. These cases will then be subject of a case management hearing and most likely then slotted back into the Courts’ listing patters for the first appearance to take place.

 

  • As a result of the above, there is no immediate change to the processes of West Midlands Police.

 

  • Bail legislation is being reviewed to allow further bail than the current charge and bail/RPI to first appearance timelines.

 

I am told by colleagues who have done court duties that the guidance is that remand courts continue but solicitors not to attend cells. The court can be cleared and client can instruct from behind the screen, unless HMCTS announce anything different. It is only custody cases being dealt with. There appears to be no other protocol in place at this stage.

 

Ms Sebah Naz Baig LLB (Hons)
Duty Qualified Consultant Solicitor

 

SNB LEGAL

naz@snbaig.com

07931 359 432

 

Secure CJSM - naz.baig@snblegal.cjsm.net           

 

signature_1330119872  signature_209637211

 

 

From: "members@mail.lccsa.org.uk" <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> on behalf of David Holmes <David@daltonholmesgray.co.uk>
Reply to: David Holmes <
David@daltonholmesgray.co.uk>
Date: Wednesday, 25 March 2020 at 10:18
To: "
members@mail.lccsa.org.uk" <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Subject: Court duty solicitor attendance

 

Dear all
Does anyone know what is currently expected of us regarding court duty attendances? Bail duties are obviously irrelevant for now, but do the courts still expect us to attend for custody duties? We had an extradition duty at Westminster yesterday - we attended, the cells were quiet (for all cases, not just extradition matters), and DJ Arbuthnot was very much of the view that Solicitors should not be attending court in person, if possible - but as far as I know there's no official line on this as yet. Any views on this would be appreciated, particularly from solicitors who are are on duty at court today.

David Holmes
Dalton Holmes Gray

Sent from my iPhone
=============================================================================

Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority no.361366

Our address is
7A DArblay Street, London W1F 8DF

This communication and any attachment contains information which is confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please telephone +44 (0) 20 7025 7878 on receipt or notify the sender by e-mail. You should not disseminate or disclose the contents to any other person or take copies. Any items expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender states them to be those of Dalton Holmes Gray.

You should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception/interruption of this e-mail.

==============================================================================

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more
Click Here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click
here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click
here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click
here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click
here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: It is business as usual at Powell Spencer & Partners. However during this difficult and uncertain time the health of our clients and staff is paramount. Accordingly our offices are now closed and all staff are working from home and are available by telephone and email. Appointments in our offices have been replaced with telephone appointments and we will continue to provide robust representation and advice to all clients.

Powell Spencer & Partners is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors' Regulation Authority. No: 57736

This e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes or disclose its contents or attachments to any other person without express permission from Powell Spencer & Partners. To do so could be a breach of confidentiality. Our data protection and privacy policies can be found on our website at www.psplaw.co.uk

If you have received this e-mail in error you are on notice of its status. Please inform us immediately by telephone on 0207 604 5600 or by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.

BEWARE OF FRAUD: If you receive an unusual request to pay money to Powell Spencer & Partners, please check with us that it is genuine. Our bank details will not change and we will never include a payment link in an email.

Thank you for your co-operation.