It is absolutely imperative for the health of all involved we stick together and support lccsa/clsa protocol.

This is from the Lancet and how they are treating the most important key workers. If nothing else we must do everything we can to lessen their burden.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30727-3/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR17S7gSrQIMtkQsZRrbZAAbdlWO34S-LTkvF1xJTAJIyMSGnvsTfK7P_Zs

On 28 Mar 2020 09:32, Greg Powell <GregPowell@psplaw.co.uk> wrote:
I agree .Prisons are closed to visitors .No new jury trials will start .we must stay home and observe strict hygiene and keep social distance .Health care workers die probably because of repetitive exposure to the virus creating a deadly viral load But we are still supposed to go to court and police stations .!

I am sorry for police officers who are in a terrible position but sense needs to prevail .Release or remote working in the handful of truly serious cases .

Support the LCCSA/CLSA protocol .

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.


-------- Original message --------
From: "Mark McKeever (via members list)" <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Date: 28/03/2020 08:58 (GMT+00:00)
To: Debbie Hunt <dhunt@wiseman.co.uk>
Cc: Hamza Ade <hadesanu@yahoo.co.uk>, Members <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Remote Police Station Attendance

I think we do need to be open to finding solutions in these extraordinary times but I am not an enthusiast for virtual participation in interviews by phone or video link. Face to face consultation and presence at interview are undoubtedly in our client’s best interest.
My concern is that we risk these forms of virtual participation becoming the norm for ever more.
I believe that our focus should be on the earliest possible release of our clients from police stations without interview.
In the vast majority of cases they are neither necessary nor in the best interests of our clients.
In the current circumstances it is undoubtedly in the best interest of our clients, the officers and ourselves that we do not breach all government and medical advice on social distancing by attending police stations for interview.
To do otherwise has implications not just for the participants but all they have subsequent contact with; which in turn has implications for all those, particularly the NHS staff, on whom we are so dependant and who do not have the option of ensuring social distancing.
I stand by the view that I originally expressed:  we should take a unified position of making representations for the release of our clients without interview and advising all of our clients to refuse to leave their cell to participate in them.
Stay safe!

Mark McKeever
Consultant Solicitor
Birds Solicitors


On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 06:30, Debbie Hunt <dhunt@wiseman.co.uk> wrote:
You’re right Hamza, our job is absolutely essential and clients do deserve full representation but these are extraordinary times requiring extraordinary solutions. In any event , no one is suggesting that clients are not fully represented- the point is that the technology exists for us to be able to fully represent them - but at a safe distance.

 It’s just not being used to protect us. Yet. 

If the crown courts are doing bail apps and PTPH’s on the phone, why can’t we have a video link into a police interview? It’s not rocket science. After all, businesses  hold conference calls with people on the other side of the world but apparently we can’t do that with our local police station. 

Sadly police, nurses and doctors cannot work remotely. We can. That’s the difference. 



Debbie Hunt
Solicitor
Criminal Law Department
Wiseman Lee


From: Hamza Ade (via members list) <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 10:09 pm
To: markfmckeever@googlemail.com
Cc: Members
Subject: Re: Remote Police Station Attendance
 

I understand your concerns. We're all share them. It's your right to choose if you want to attend or not. 
But you're not being helpful and a bit disrespectful. 

It's a risk keyworkers, police, nurses, doctors are taking every day, more so than I am with one or two clients.

Like I said, probably more than once now but you ignore that, there's an obvious risk to your client by not attending as well. 
Feel free to not attend. It's a call we all have to make.

I think all our clients still deserve full representation even in these difficult times.


Peace


On ‎Friday‎, ‎27‎ ‎March‎ ‎2020‎ ‎21‎:‎46‎:‎30‎ ‎GMT, markfmckeever@googlemail.com <markfmckeever@googlemail.com> wrote:



 You are obviously feeling very confident that you and nobody you care about are going to end up at the 4000 bed field hospital at the Excel centre or the 1400 corpse mortuary at Birmingham airport. 
 Perhaps take a look at this and give a little more thought to the subject and show a bit more respect for your professional colleagues:



Mark
Sent from my iPhone

On 27 Mar 2020, at 21:11, Hamza Ade <hadesanu@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


My names's there. If you know a Hamza who's a solicitor it'll be me most likely. Make an effort, google or something. That's not the important bit it sounds petty.

I'm being serious. I'm not trying to make light of the crisis and current circumstances but while we're all on here justifying our role  as essential workers, doctors, nurses and police are sitting there doing the job and facing the public.

Either we're essential or we aren't. Either our job is something we can properly do on the end of a phone or it isn't. Either make your stand and refuse to attend or do a proper job. But we're often heard to be talking about our job protecting the vulnerable, so do it properly or not at all. I would estimate I intervene in a large proportion of my interviews, it might be because I'm a misery or because I don't want officers taking liberties with my client.
I can't do that if I'm not there.

I can of course tell my client 'go no comment' over the phone. But then when the officer reminds him/her  for the fifth or sixth time he/she may not get another 'opportunity' and 'it is just advice' and officer simply wants to find out what happened and all the other tricks who's there to support my client? Me on my sofa doing it by remote control?

As a colleague said (no I'm not naming her for your benefit), "has everyone forgotten why we're supposed to be there in the first place?"


Hamza Adesanu
(If that's of any consequence)

On ‎Friday‎, ‎27‎ ‎March‎ ‎2020‎ ‎20‎:‎42‎:‎14‎ ‎GMT, <markfmckeever@googlemail.com> wrote:


If you are going to contribute to the serious debate in this manner perhaps you could have the Integrity to identify yourself.  
Mark McKeever
Consultant Solicitor 
Birds Solicitors 

Mark
Sent from my iPhone

On 27 Mar 2020, at 19:27, Hamza Ade (via members list) <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> wrote:


The interview bit is important. You might identify a need to change your advice based on the questions that are asked. Clients often complain about solicitors who just 'sat there' in interview and we've all seen interviews where this has happened in reality. This is also that in reality

I'm uneasy about just 'mailing it in' and there's a risk clients will get the wrong impression of a solicitor who couldn't be arsed to turn up.

I know measures need to be taken but congratulating ourselves for providing a half arsed service isn't it.

Take your wipes, wear a mask, carry gloves, make your checks, keep your distance. 
But short changing clients is wrong.
Next thing we'll be advising clients in court over the phone or even doing whole trials that way. Why not, it's no less difficult to arrange? Have your client on facetime, hook up his or her  phone to the court speakers. Do it all in your jim jams. 
Profitable but wrong

On ‎Friday‎, ‎27‎ ‎March‎ ‎2020‎ ‎16‎:‎19‎:‎16‎ ‎GMT, Debbie Hunt <dhunt@wiseman.co.uk> wrote:


I had an own client at Wood Green Police station this morning arrested for domestic common assault and breach restraining order.

I explained to the client on the phone  that neither myself or a colleague were prepared to attend him face to face in the present circumstances for obvious reasons  but that I was more than happy to advise and assist him over the phone/video.   I advised that if he wanted a solicitor in person there was nothing to stop him seeking advice elsewhere.   He said he was happy to deal with it over phone/video.

I then explained the position to the OIC who asked me what I was proposing.  I requested the custody record to be emailed to me and disclosure over the phone/email.  I requested that the interview be done through a video link of some sort.  The custody record was emailed to me within about 5 minutes and the OIC gave me verbal disclosure.  The OIC said there was “no facility” to conduct an  interview on phone or video link.  I challenged this but she said  that’s what she had been told by the custody officer whose name I made a note of I then spoke with the client over the phone  for 20 minutes  on a clear telephone line during which I gave legal advice and took his  instructions in just the same way as if I had been in the same room.   As a result of his instructions I advised we should proceed by way of a prepared statement and no comment interview.  Client agreed.  I then drafted a PS and spoke to the client again who approved it.    I then rang the OIC and emailed it to her with a request that it be read out in the interview and that I was on the end of a phone if client wanted further legal advice.    I  then had  a post interview consultation with the client who was happy with the way things had gone so far.   It all worked well with the cooperation of the OIC.  The only problem was that I was not in the actual interview – this could be solved easily with the goodwill of custody. 

I am now just waiting for a charge decision. 

Having spent nearly 2 ½ hours dealing with the phone consultations, statements, emails  etc with no  detriment to  my client  it would seem very “unjust” if we are denied a full fee for this work if we  can only claim for telephone advice.    So much for a  “Criminal Justice System “  ……

 

Debbie Hunt

Solicitor

Criminal Law Department

 

Covid-19

 

At Wiseman Lee LLP the health of our clients, staff and professional contacts is of paramount importance. In view of Government advice regarding social distancing  and non-essential travel please feel free to contact us either by telephone or email. We will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible – otherwise it is business as usual.

 

If you currently have an existing matter with us, rest assured that we are working on it, but please email or telephone us if you have any questions or concerns. As with most firms everyone at Wiseman Lee LLP will be working remotely and our people are available via telephone and email..

 

If you have an appointment booked with us we will contact you to arrange a telephone appointment if appropriate or offer you an alternative appointment in the future. To comply with the governments' policy on social distancing please do not come into our offices. Our reception areas are closed.

Wherever possible please send all communications on this matter electronically. This will help ensure there is no delay in us responding to you and that we can continue to work effectively with you.  Avoid post or DX wherever possible. Please telephone if you have any query concerning this.

We appreciate your understanding in these challenging times.

 

 

 

 

<image001.jpg>
 


Telephone              +44 (0) 208 215 1000

 

Address                   229 Hoe Street

                                  Walthamstow

                                  London E17 9PP                 

 

                                 

Website                  www.wiseman.co.uk         

 


 

Wiseman Lee LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership registered in England and Wales with registration number OC333325 and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, firm number 486946. A list of members is available for inspection at the registered office 9-13 Cambridge Park Road, London E11 2PU. We use the word "partner" to refer to a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications.

The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient at the email address to which it has been addressed. It may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than this addressee, nor may it be copied in any way. If received in error, please contact Wiseman Lee LLP on +44 (0)20 8215 1000 quoting the name of the sender and the addressee and then delete it from your system. Please note that neither Wiseman Lee LLP nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Wiseman Lee LLP by means of email communication.

 

Cyber Crime Alert
Emails can be scammed. Please do not rely on email notification of bank account changes without direct verbal confirmation from a trusted source.

 

 


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here
.
<image001.jpg>
<image003.jpg>
<image002.jpg>

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: It is business as usual at Powell Spencer & Partners. However during this difficult and uncertain time the health of our clients and staff is paramount. Accordingly our offices are now closed and all staff are working from home and are available by telephone and email. Appointments in our offices have been replaced with telephone appointments and we will continue to provide robust representation and advice to all clients.

Powell Spencer & Partners is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors' Regulation Authority. No: 57736

This e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes or disclose its contents or attachments to any other person without express permission from Powell Spencer & Partners. To do so could be a breach of confidentiality. Our data protection and privacy policies can be found on our website at www.psplaw.co.uk

If you have received this e-mail in error you are on notice of its status. Please inform us immediately by telephone on 0207 604 5600 or by reply e-mail and then delete this message from your system.

BEWARE OF FRAUD: If you receive an unusual request to pay money to Powell Spencer & Partners, please check with us that it is genuine. Our bank details will not change and we will never include a payment link in an email.

Thank you for your co-operation.

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.