Good evening

 

Thanks everyone for all the helpful advice on remote working for police interviews. There is no perfect solution for all cases.

 

I have liaised with the custody managers at 2 of our most used stations – Kingston and Wandsworth requesting facilities to attend upon clients remotely.

I suggested

  1. Receiving disclosure on the telephone by the officer
  2. Giving advice to the detainee on the phone (in a private booth)
  3. If the case warrants a prepared statement, for this to be emailed to the officer and read out in interview
  4. Post interview consultation as 2 above.

This is subject to the detainee agreeing to telephone advice without the physical presence of the solicitor.

 

Here is the response from Wandsworth

 

This is an excellent idea – I will send a copy of your letter to our Command’s HQ and we will consider offering this London-wide.

 

Points 1-4 we can implement, at least at Wandsworth immediately, this will smooth the process of legal provision nicely given the current circumstances and the concerns expressed by Solicitors attending police stations at present.

 

I will circulate your letter amongst our Inspectors and Custody Sgts today.

 

With regard to video conferencing, you are correct, we have two interview rooms which are video-link equipped, I am not entirely sure (will clarify) whether they are the same system the courts use. I suspect not, mainly because some Met Police Stations do offer “virtual court” services for those refused bail, but Wandsworth is not one of them. At the moment the link is used for Interpreters and increasingly by Superintendents to grant extensions of detention. Interpreters travel to “hubs” around London which I believe are inside police premises. As far as I know, that system is a closed one for the police only.

 

Remote video link legal advice is something I think organisationally we should explore, but in reality I can’t think of an easy technical solution that could be implemented before this awful virus somehow disappears, or becomes far less of a risk.

 

Thank you for your helpful suggestion.

 

Marcus.

 

Inspector Marcus Moore

Custody Manager

 

Metropolitan Police | Wandsworth Police Station | 146 Wandsworth High Street | London | SW18 4JJ

 

Telephone 020 3276 2535     Internal 712 535

 

Direct Dial 020 3276 2535

 

Email marcus.moore@met.pnn.police.uk

 

In addition I asked if interviews can take place with a mobile phone on loudspeaker and the officer was again receptive and could see no reason why this cannot be done. This was apparently done in one case at Wandsworth this afternoon.

 

I have also added that disclosure and custody front sheets be emailed to the solicitor/rep – I haven’t received a response to this but I can’t see it being a problem.

 

It is only a small step but a helpful one at least. So if you are covering south London tonight, remote attendance should not be a problem

 

This firm is not accepting back up cases!

 

Kind regards

 

Joan

 

CLIFTON SOLICITORS & ADVOCATES

Registered Office

Argyll House

1a All Saints Passage

Wandsworth

London

SW18 1EP

T: 020 3189 0087

M: 07484 669 445

Text messages to this number out of hours may not be picked up or answered until the next working day. If your message is urgent please call instead

Secure email for cjsm users: crime.department@cliftonsolicitors.cjsm.net

 

www.cliftonsolicitors.co.uk

 

This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. The contents may be the subject of legal professional privilege and may be protected by the Court. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Clifton Solicitors & Advocates. E mails sent to clients are subject to our terms of business and we do not endorse e mails that do not concern the business of the firm. Unauthorised use or disclosure of this e mail is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy, forward, print, use, or retain this e mail.   Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error and delete it from your system.  Emails sent by and to us may be monitored to ensure compliance with the firm’s policies and for the protection of our business.

E mails may not be error free or completely secure, can be corrupted and their arrival on time or at all cannot be relied upon.   E Mails can also be intercepted externally and by communicating us via e mail the sender accepts these risks.  Internal interception/distribution of e mails will be taken very seriously and Clifton Solicitors & Advocates will investigate any such actions fully  in line with the firm’s policies.   

 

This message and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened.  It is, nevertheless, the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for any loss or damage in any way arising from its use.  We recommend that recipients scan e mails for viruses before opening them.

 

Clifton Solicitors & Advocates does not accept service by e mail.

 

Clifton Solicitors & Advocates is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority  - SRA No: 629355. Further details can be found at http://www.sra.org.uk/

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> On Behalf Of sandra cacchioli
Sent: 28 March 2020 17:35
To: bridget.irving@yahoo.co.uk; Joe Mensah-Dankwah <Joemensah@foresterssolicitors.co.uk>
Cc: Chris PICKWICK <chris@pickwicksolicitors.co.uk>; Jonathan Black <jonathanb@bsbsolicitors.co.uk>; Members <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Common Video Platform - Remote Police Station Working

 

The common video platform CVP - could this be a temporary way of representing clients remotely at the police station?

 

The CVP is being used by the Tribunal service and scaled up fairly  rapidly in last few weeks.

 

It's MOJ approved and is being used for private hearings. 

 

It's a visual  link with sound and can link up to 21 people at different locations - and accessed via any device with an internet connection. 

 

To have a meeting/ hearing / conference / - one party who has a "cloud room" - bought from Kinly for £50.00 per month  controls the meeting and sends other parties a link, the benefit of solicitors having  a "cloud room" is that you can lock other participants out when you need to have a private consultation with the client. 

 

Surely something like this can be made to work? 

 

Sandra    

 

 

??

 


From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> on behalf of Joe Mensah-Dankwah <Joemensah@foresterssolicitors.co.uk>
Sent: 28 March 2020 17:16
To:
bridget.irving@yahoo.co.uk <bridget.irving@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: Chris PICKWICK <
chris@pickwicksolicitors.co.uk>; Jonathan Black <jonathanb@bsbsolicitors.co.uk>; Members <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk>
Subject: Re: from the LAA update - Can claim a fee

 

Here’s my experience of advising and assisting a client on the telephone. My colleague took the call and advised last night. The OIC called me at 10:30am today. I took the usual details and told him that I proposed to deal with it all on the phone. He said they had been told to expect that. (By the way, this was Kent Police, very cultured, in my view!).  I requested a copy of the CR by email and took down his verbal disclosure. I also took his email address. I ascertained that V had not given a statement and was not willing to cooperate. I told him I would have a consultation by phone and proposed to participate in the interview on the end of my phone. They don’t have a video link or PCU wifi  but we’d see how it goes. I said I was happy for the interview to proceed if he didn’t get reception. (I know my client, you see). Then the custody Officer called me, also in a collegiate attitude of mind. She agreed to take the hands-free phone into the cell and after my consultation, if I wanted to be in the interview, she would see if the OIC’s phone would have enough reception to call me from the interview room. I had my chat with the client. He’s an old hand well capable of handling a no comment interview. But I still advised that in a domestic where she has refused to give a statement, even though he had a self defence claim, it was best to go no comment. After introductions and the caution, he would answer the first question with no comment and to the rest either go no comment or just sit silently. 

 

I waited for the call but it didn’t come. Then when I hadn’t heard from the oic I sent an email at 1:30pm asking about the result, and that I wanted to be called if there was any issue about bail. Then the oic called at 2:50pm to say there’d been no reception in the interview room and the client was happy to do it without me. He’d gone no comment to the first question and silent the rest of the time. CPS had advised no charge so he had been released. Then the client called me from home happy at 15:29. That’s  5 hours dealing with one case without leaving my bed (well...). No reason I shouldn’t get paid the full fee.

 

I struggle with this idea that our clients are so very vulnerable, they have to see us to feel assisted. On average, (my stats) DPs are in the nick for 8-18 hours. When we attend, we are there for a couple of hours and only with the client alone for half of that time. (Except, of course for your serious arrestables). How are their vulnerabilities assuaged the rest of the time when we are not there?

 

Joe Mensah-Dankwah. 

Foresters Solicitors Limited

 

Sent from my iPhone



On 28 Mar 2020, at 16:29, Bridget Irving (via members list) <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> wrote:

Very well done and many thanks for the huge efforts and hard work by The LCCSA and individuals involved in achieving this.

 

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 21:17, Chris PICKWICK

Evening. Does no one have the answer to my question? Harvey! Jim!

 

 

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Chris PICKWICK <chris@pickwicksolicitors.co.uk>

Date: 27/03/2020 17:55 (GMT+00:00)

Subject: RE: from the LAA update - Can claim a fee

 

 

Does there have to be a presence (whether phone or video ) during the i/v itself to claim an att. fee?

 

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: Jonathan Black <jonathanb@bsbsolicitors.co.uk>

Date: 27/03/2020 16:53 (GMT+00:00)

Subject: from the LAA update - Can claim a fee

 

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-legal-aid-agency-contingency-response?utm_source=c41c7d7f-183a-4ad9-a80c-da4e30f2da1d&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications&utm_content=immediate#financial-support

Claiming police station attendance fee

Providers are still required to provide advice and assistance to clients in custody suites.

Depending on local police practices and their own health concerns, you may not be able to physically attend on those clients.

Should an attendance be made by other means (phone or video), either because of a police force’s contingency arrangements or because current Government safeguarding guidelines mean you cannot physically, you can claim the Police Station Attendance Fixed Fee appropriate to the location.

A file note should be kept as to the circumstances of the arrangements, confirming both the police and the client were happy to proceed without a physical attendance.

Providers should claim as usual for the Telephone Advice Fixed Fee as appropriate, but they should not claim for Telephone Advice Fixed Fee and the Police Station Attendance Fixed Fee for the same matter. A DSCC Reference Number will also be required as normal.

 


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

Foresters Solicitors Limited is registered in England and Wales, with registered office at 155 Hoe Street London E17 3AL. Company Number 6650930. Directors: Joe Mensah-Dankwah, Alan Hardy Boulton, John Yiannourides. This firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

This email is confidential and may be privileged. It is for the use of the named recipients only. If you have received it in error, please notify us immediately and delete it from your computer system. Please do not copy or disclose its contents to any person or body.


Foresters_Email_Disclaimer_201607


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.