Well put Richard.

I think there may be a point or two that Romana  has missed!



You seem to have missed the point Penny ‘those that can work from home, should!’ people attended public places to contribute to foot fall in this time is assisting in the spread of the new variant and the virus , ultimately this will lead to a national lockdown. Nobody should be congratulating you for that. What is being suggested is a temporary measure I believe.

 

Regards

Romana

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> On Behalf Of Penny Muir
Sent: 10 December 2021 10:13
To: 'Hannah Sampson' <hannah@sampson-law.co.uk>; Ros Olleson <rolleson@talk21.com>
Cc: Maggie Frame <maggie@brookelavingtonlaw.co.uk>; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: RE: The proposed move to protocal 3 in police stations

 

I am afraid I am a bit of an outlier on this. Police officers, police station staff, magistrates, judges,  cell staff at court etc, don’t generally have the luxury of choosing to  work from home and apart from those with underlying health conditions, I really don’t see why we reasonably robust solicitors should necessarily be exempt from attending courts and police stations. in person.

 

Perhaps it’s my advanced age (which I suppose is my underlying health condition!) but I don’t usually  find remote attendances as satisfactory as in person attendances I do attend the magistrates court and recently the chairman of the Bench  at Thames congratulated me for being there in person (as of course he was.)!

 

Being in court in person enables you to speak not just to the client but also his/her family if in attendance too, not to mention to the prosecutor (normally present) and probation if necessary. I’m not sure that defence solicitors refusing to attend reflects well on the profession but I was glad to see that there were several othe colleagues there  as well

 

Penny Muir

 

 

Penny Muir - Partner Lewis Nedas Law 24 Camden High Street London NW1 0JH Tel: +44 (0) 207 387 2032 Fax: +44 (0) 207 388 6575 Web: http://lewisnedas.co.uk/

<image001.png> <image002.png>

Lewis Nedas Law is the trading name of Lewis Nedas Law Limited, A company authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority No. 567461 and registered in England and Wales (registered number 07958260) at 24 Camden High Street London NW1 0JH. Directors: Jeffrey Lewis, Miles Herman, Richard McConnell and Ian Coupland. We use the term Partner to refer to senior solicitors with equivalent standing and qualifications. Partners are not directors, unless named as such.

This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to and from us may be monitored.

Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.

PLEASE BE AWARE OF CYBER CRIME

Lewis Nedas Law only uses the @lewisnedas.co.uk email domain for correspondence. If you receive an email from any different email domain IT IS NOT FROM LEWIS NEDAS.

Lewis Nedas Law WILL NOT notify you of changes to its bank account details by email. If you receive any communications suggesting that Lewis Nedas Law’s bank account details have changed, you should contact Lewis Nedas Law using the number on its website or its headed notepaper immediately to confirm the details before making payment. Please be aware that a phishing email may contain a fraudulent phone number for Lewis Nedas Law so never call the number indicated in such an email. Lewis Nedas Law will not take responsibility if you transfer money to a wrong account.

If you wish to notify us of a change to your bank details to those originally provided we will not accept these by email without additional documentation and confirmation being provided.

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Hannah Sampson
Sent: 09 December 2021 23:36
To: Ros Olleson <rolleson@talk21.com>
Cc: Maggie Frame <maggie@brookelavingtonlaw.co.uk>; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: Re: The proposed move to protocal 3 in police stations

 

I couldn’t agree more Ros.

 

Maggie does deserve our support and you couldn’t have put it better 

Sent from my iPhone

 

On 9 Dec 2021, at 23:28, Ros Olleson (via members list) <members@mail.lccsa.org.uk> wrote:

 I think Maggie should have some support here and applause from us all for carrying this flag. Many of us shielded for 16 months or more due to underlying health issues and would have been out of business but for the ability to work remotely.   The exceptionally difficult working requirements of the job and inadequate arrangements leave us particularly vulnerable, particularly given our clientele.  Many of my clients refuse to wear masks on spurious grounds they are exempt and several have told me they are conspiracy theorists about Covid and anti vaccers. There were very few clients I dealt with who objected or whom I thought could not cope with remote attendance. I likewise will not go back to police stations yet as I also have underlying health issues and quite frankly have absolutely no confidence in the measures in place to ensure my safety.   I have heard some dreadful anecdotal tales. At least at court we have some degree of control although in my court measures are perfunctory. I have been asking all week for sanitiser in the courts as they have all run out. 

Whilst we all appreciate the tireless efforts made on entirely voluntary basis by our reps from LCCSA and CLSA we clearly are not being listened to. 

 

 

Regards

Ros

Ros Olleson solicitor

07951 242 693

 

On 9 Dec 2021, at 20:13, Maggie Frame <maggie@brookelavingtonlaw.co.uk> wrote:



Sorry I said protocal 3 but it was not actually dealt with until protocal 4.

 

From: Maggie Frame [mailto:maggie@brookelavingtonlaw.co.uk]
Sent: 09 December 2021 19:58
To: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: The proposed move to protocal 3 in police stations

 

 

Dear all,

 

Now is your opportunity to tell the LCCSA that the proposed move to protocal 3 is not sufficient and not in line with the governments introduction of plan b.  It is simpley a move back to in person attendance for anyone who needs an AA.  Thats a large number of our clients and those we deal with on duty.

 

We need plan B to be an exception under exception 3 as the governments states we should work from home.  The other representative bodies has made a suggestion that plan b allows us to work remotely under this exception without the need to mopve to plan b see next email where I will forward what I received.

 

In my view we need to resume remote interviews for all clients as we did prior to protocal 3 as the government has moved back to working from home where possible to try and slow the spread of the new variant and to save christemas.

 

Please don’t just leave it as if you do it will be protocal 3 and in person attendance for most client as many need AA and in addition no exception for solictors self isolating as that was not dealt with until protocal 3.

 

This has to be sorted out immediately and urgently so please get writing and express your views to the LCCSA .

 

Noone else can sort this out for you so don’t leave it to your colleagues and then complain when nothing gets done for us.

 

My view is new protocal 5 incorporating the temporary measures introduced by government and allowing all interviews to be remote until the government moves away from plan b and to follow the advice of government as to when it is safe to resume protocal 4.

Please read the suggestion of other representative bodies which I will forward to all of you.

 

Kind Regards

 

 

Margaret Frame ( Partner )

Brooke Lavington Law

17 – 21 George Street

Croydon

Surrey

CR0 1LA

 

 

Telephone : 07939 088264

Email : maggie@brookelavingtonlaw.co.uk

Secure email : margaret.frame@bll.cjsm.net

 

The contents of this email and any attachements is strictly confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) only.  Accesss to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you received this email in error please notify the sender immediately by reply email, or telephone 07939 088264/ 07969 567978 and delete it from your system. Please note that if you are not the intended receipient, you must not copy, distribute or otherwise act on any part of this email or its’ attachments.

 

Please note that the confidentiality of email communication is not warranted. Although we have taken precautions to ensure that this email and any attachments are free from virues, we would advise you that it is your responsibility to be sure this is the case by running your own checks. Brooke Lavington Law accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of software viruses.

 

 

Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

Solicitors Regulation Authority No 538264

 

---

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

---

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

 

Click here to report this email as spam.

---

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

 

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

---

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

---

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

T: +44 (0)20 3131 9710
F: +44 (0)20 7710 6300

This message is sent for and on behalf of Saunders Solicitors Limited, whose office is at 6 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AY. Whose Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Limited Company No 09562961 registered in England and Wales. We do not accept service by fax or email. This e-mail is confidential to the intended addressee, and may contain privileged information. If you have received it in error, kindly let us know by return e-mail, and then delete the message. Security Warning: Internet email is not a 100% secure communications medium, you should understand and accept this lack of security when emailing us. Viruses: In keeping with good computing practice the recipients of emails should ensure they are actually virus free.

To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.