I totally agree with Steven.

We don’t do a lot, most 3-4 in a year but I would be happy not to do any as this is another way of squeezing the solicitors even further. You have my support.

Kind Regards

 

Haroon Shah

Partner

IMRAN KHAN AND PARTNERS

Incorporating Christian Khan Solicitors

47 Theobalds Road

London

WC1X 8SP

DX: 35711 Bloomsbury

DDI: 020 3384 0814

Tel: 020 7404 3004
Fax: 020 7404 3005

Email: haroons@ikandp.co.uk

Web: www.ikandp.co.uk

 

Partners: MISKhan Ltd., HShah Ltd., SEhzuvan Ltd, Balvinder Gill Ltd and BBansal Ltd

Imran Khan and Partners is a partnership of limited companies. Any reference to partners in any document should be taken as being references to the directors of the limited companies and not to individual partners of the firm.

 

legal500_leadingfirm_2015Accredited Criminal LitigationAccredited Children LawResolution - first for family law146235485028219

 

 

This electronic email (including attachments) is confidential and may be privileged.  Access to this electronic transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorised. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately. You may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use any part of it.  It is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that this email is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Imran Khan and Partners for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use of it.  Emails are susceptible to interference.  The contents of this email may not have originated from Imran Khan and Partners, or be accurately reproduced.  If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version

THIS FIRM IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE SOLICITORS REGULATION AUTHORITY

Solicitors Regulation Authority No: 208237

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Steven Bird
Sent: 10 February 2017 13:41
To: 'Jonathan Black'; 'members@mail.lccsa.org.uk'
Subject: RE: MOJ consultation on LGFS and Court appointees

 

The answer is to grant non means tested legal aid on these cases in my view.

 

Hopefully on legal aid rates most firms will not deal with s38 cases. The fee on each case would probably be in the region of £200 max – nothing to get excited about. It would be really good if there could be a unity on this tiny issue among the profession. Boycott s38s – how easy is that!?

 

Steven Bird |  Managing Director

Birds Solicitors

 

61 Wandsworth High Street | Wandsworth | London | SW18 2PT| DX 59062 WANDSWORTH NORTH

T: 020 8874 7433 | DDI: 020 3657 7260 | F: 020 8870 4770   

E: s.bird@birds.eu.com  | W: www.birds.eu.com

 

Follow us on Twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this email   

 

The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. Unauthorised recipients are required to maintain confidentiality. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately, destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us and sent as an attachment to this e-mail will be and remain vested in us and will not be transferred to you.

Birds Solicitors is a trading name of Birds Solicitors Limited, a company registered under company number 07191888. The registered office of Birds Solicitors Limited is 61 Wandsworth High Street, London SW18 2PT. Birds Solicitors Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 534497

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jonathan Black
Sent: 10 February 2017 13:32
To: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: MOJ consultation on LGFS and Court appointees

 

5.       https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/lgfs-and-court-appointees/supporting_documents/impactassesments38courtappointees.pdf

 

5. We consider that, despite the fact that this can be a sensitive task, the work of court appointees under section 38 or section 4A is in reality no different to that undertaken by lawyers acting for a defendant under legal aid. Therefore we propose capping such costs at legal aid rates, as we have already done in relation to Defendants’ Costs Orders. There is no reason to pay a premium for this work just because payment is made from central funds rather than the legal aid budget. The work involved and time required to prepare is little different from many legal aid cases. 


Sent from my iPhone


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


 


THIS IS NOT AN INTERNAL COMMUNICATION

This email was delivered to the Advanced365 Mail system from an internet sender

This email message has been scanned for viruses and other dangerous content by the Advanced365 Mail systems and is believed to be clean but is not warranted to be free of any malicious content

All internet emails are inherently unsecure and you should always exercise caution when opening attachments from, or clicking on links in emails even when the sender of the email appears to be someone you know


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.