There is not the slightest chance of any boycott ever enjoying widespread support in London. See the touts referred to by JB below. London is brim full of them.

 

Anthony Branley

Principal

 

 

GBSols Logo

 

GALBRAITH BRANLEY
SOLICITORS

18 FRIERN PARK
NORTH FINCHLEY
LONDON
N12 9DA

 

020 8446 8474

Emergency No. 07831 166462

 

www.galbraithbranley.com

 

Authorised and Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority-SRA No.614583

This e-mail is sent for and on behalf of Galbraith Branley Solicitors. Its contents and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not an intended recipient the dissemination and/or copying of the e-mail and its attachments are prohibited. If you have received this in error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete the e-mail completely from your system.

 

Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that they are virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Galbraith Branley for any loss or damage arising in any way from receipt or use.

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Chris Bennett
Sent: 10 February 2017 14:54
To: 'Bruce Reid'; 'Jonathan Black'
Cc: 'Tim Walker'; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: RE: MOJ consultation on LGFS and Court appointees

 

Surely this is a boycott that everyone will agree on at last – for the reasons given by Bruce.

 

Chris  Bennett

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Bruce Reid (via members list)
Sent: 10 February 2017 14:36
To: Jonathan Black
Cc: Tim Walker; members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: Re: MOJ consultation on LGFS and Court appointees

 

We dont need a boycott, firms wont take them on....It will pay less than a summary trial and you cant get cover for those half the time given the going rate even now.

 

On 10 February 2017 at 14:13, Jonathan Black <jonathanb@bsbsolicitors.co.uk> wrote:

No one will do s38 at these rates and they will become the bread and butter  of court based touts which will be tolerated .

 

Both proposals come with the ultimatum - accept or we introduce second cut ! 

Sent from my iPhone


On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:03, Tim Walker <twalker@smw-law.co.uk> wrote:

Also see Part I para 9:

 

‘we propose reducing the 10,000 threshold for PPE and moving claims for pages in excess of 6,000 into the special preparation provisions. It is in cases with 6,000 or more pages that we have seen a significant increase in PPE caused in in part by electronic evidence now coming within the definition of PPE, most commonly mobile phone or computer downloads in serious drugs and fraud cases. Applying the special preparation provisions will mean that where there are more than 6,000 pages we will allow payment for work reasonably and actually undertaken.’

 

From: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk [mailto:members@mail.lccsa.org.uk] On Behalf Of Jonathan Black
Sent: 10 February 2017 13:32
To: members@mail.lccsa.org.uk
Subject: MOJ consultation on LGFS and Court appointees

 

5.      https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/lgfs-and-court-appointees/supporting_documents/impactassesments38courtappointees.pdf

 

5. We consider that, despite the fact that this can be a sensitive task, the work of court appointees under section 38 or section 4A is in reality no different to that undertaken by lawyers acting for a defendant under legal aid. Therefore we propose capping such costs at legal aid rates, as we have already done in relation to Defendants’ Costs Orders. There is no reason to pay a premium for this work just because payment is made from central funds rather than the legal aid budget. The work involved and time required to prepare is little different from many legal aid cases. 


Sent from my iPhone


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

 


Sonn Macmillan Walker is a trading name of Sonn Macmillan Walker Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales no. 7879842. The registered office is at Rennie House, 57-60 Aldgate High Street

London EC3N 1AL

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority no. 566039.

This communication and any attachment contains information which is confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please telephone +44 (0) 20 7481 9157 on receipt or notify the sender by e-mail. You should not disseminate or disclose the contents to any other person or take copies. Any items expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender states them to be those of Sonn Macmillan Walker.

You should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. We accept no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses or interception/interruption of this e-mail.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

 


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.


To unsubscribe from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To take a break from receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.

To resume receiving emails from the LCCSA Members eGroup click here.